DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TEACHING AND LAWS

of  unidoscontralaapostasia

1) When the Lord Jesus said to the adulterous woman, "Go and sin no more", first asked. "No one condemned you?" If those who were witnesses to have found in the act of adultery not condemned, because instead of complying with the Act were, defendants moved away one by one by his conscience-the Lord Jesus Christ , as Man, had not witnessed such an act, took the opportunity to say, "Neither do I condemn you," because He, in His first coming, did not come to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through Him (John 3:17). He added: "Go, and sin no more." NO said, "Well, you can rebuild your life with another man." So Jesus NOT violated the law; witnesses, in any case, were those who had to comply. But remember that at that time they were under the domination of Rome, therefore, they could not do this, they had the freedom to do so. "Then said Pilate unto them, Take him yourselves and judge him by your law And the Jews said : A we DO NOT PERMITTED ANYONE GIVE DEATH ... "(John 18.31).

Anyway, Doctrine is NOT synonymous with Law; consider them synonymous CONFUSE the reader is simple.

2 º) Jesus never 'on a couple of occasions allowed violated the doctrine of keeping the Sabbath'. First, DO NOT confuse doctrine with Law The Sabbath was not a doctrine but, one of the Ten Commandments of the Law Second, neither Jesus nor his disciples violated any law of the Sabbath, since glean (a few I do not mean to work in the field and put together bundles or bundles of wheat) was NOT ban law but Jewish TRADITION, we can find in the Talmud or Shabbath. They had reached the extreme of prohibiting cooking or boiling an egg on the Sabbath or Saturday, as this was a job, nor could cover with a little wax Cuba hole losing a liquid, nor on the Sabbath or rest could clean a wound ... However, with twisted reasoning allowed to do things that I was favorable at your convenience: If on the Sabbath a man needed to move a sheaf of wheat, enough to put a spoon in use, thereby removing the spoon could also be the sheaf on which the spoon was placed. Pura hypocrisy (Shabb. 142 b, line 6 from the bottom).

3 º) It was on a couple of occasions were more than twice:
Matthew 12:1-8 (The pins), Matthew 12.9-14 (dry hand), Luke  13.10-17  (The woman bent), Luke 14.1-6 (The dropsy), John 5.1-18 (The Paralytic), John 9.1-16 (The Blind since birth). These cases do not need to explain them one by one, as the Lord Himself says in those passages.

4th) If Jesus had violated the law or have allowed others to violate, NO would have been the "high priest (who) became us, holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made ​​higher than the heavens." (Hebrews 7.26). Remember that Jesus was not born at the time of the New Testament, although the story is history there, Jesus Christ was born in the days of the Old Covenant, because God's Word says: "But when the fullness of time, God sent his Son, born of woman, born under law,
to redeem those who were under the law ... "(Galatians 4:4-5).

5th) It is clear that 'God in Heaven is NOT a list of Doctrines palomeando those where I'm wrong, to send me to Hell "! If so, many dear friends, to which the G12 Government of Twelve (Opus Dei of the Jesuits infiltrated) asked brainwashed or manipulated their emotions would head to Hell for practicing heretical doctrine. But no, when the Holy Spirit opens their eyes, they come out of there, because they are part of God's people: "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues." (Revelation 18:4). Although we make every day unfortunately some sin or deviation from His teaching, once we come to Him for forgiveness, because we are His children!

6 º) However, we read in the 2nd John 1:9 that "NO perseveres IN THE DOCTRINE of Christ, NOT GOD, He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.

7th) Whoa! So NO is so true that that "" God is NOT obsessed with that we have the correct doctrine, but the heart. " It is true that "we can believe all the right things and be lost", but NOT true in reverse: we can live, practice, believe, profess Heresy all the time, all our lives and yet be saved! We are not talking here of perfection can be, as in the case of those deceived by the G12, which have been washed and convinced by his former pastor of sound doctrine and then swerved and involved in so-called Meeting God (by washing the brain in three days and manipulating their emotions) that they are a time when these heresies, until the passenger psychological effect weakened. But, if you are indeed the Lord and have been washed in the precious Blood of Christ, like the Prodigal Son will return to the Father. And if they do, if they do not return to the fold, IS BECAUSE HAVE NEVER HAD THE FATHER AND THE SON (2nd John 1:9).

Unfortunately, IT IS TRUE THAT CAN HAPPEN INSIDE: right Doctrine but having the hypocritical heart, a religious reproach in his conduct: not smoke, do not fornicate, not going to the dance ... but NEVER her heart was humbled to the Lordship of Christ and NEVER recognized a lost sinner and NEVER experienced a genuine REPENTANCE of your sins and NEVER acknowledged that is a miserable IDOLATER who bows before images and has made a pact Jesuit to simulate being a Christian in the ranks of true Christians, to divide , confuse and deceive, if possible, even the elect.

I say this because I have very present now and is what I have been meditating and researching, following the events in these days that are public knowledge.

Anyway, BOTH the right heart and the right doctrine must go together. And I am reminded of this text as appropriate for this meditation: "For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge." (Romans 10.2).

We could build four groups:
1) They have zeal but no Science (heart right, wrong doctrine);
2) Have Science but have Celo (right doctrine but wrong heart)
3) Not have neither zeal nor Science,
4) have Zeal and have Science.

To which group would you belong?